On Monday 25 February 2008 08:28:14 Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text
> Grant Grundler wrote:
> > ISTR there was a time when tulip would compete with de4x5 for devices.
> > tulip is the preferred driver. That's clearly no longer the case
> > and perhaps both distro's need to revisit this.
>
> The only reason why de4x5 still exists is that the /tulip/ driver fails
> to work on a few chips like the 21142 (43?) shipped in various alpha boxen.
>
> de4x5 needs to go away, it's been unmaintained for ages, doesn't support
> any of the new hotplug APIs.

But has extensive port auto-detection which seems to work great (at least on 
my card). I don't feel like porting that code to de2104x - the code looks 
complex.

quoted text
>
> > de2104x is a "work in progress".
> > That's why it's marked "EXPERIMENTAL" in the Kconfig file.
>
> It's not a work in progress, it works just fine for most people (the few
> that are left).
>
> Last I heard, there was a problem with non-twisted-pair stuff, but
> that's about it.
>
> 'experimental' is generally a poorly maintained marker.

So we have two unmaintained drivers - one that works fine (and is production 
quality - or at least seems to be) but does not support hotplug APIs and one 
that was never finished (the TP-unplug problem is present at least since 
2003).
Perhaps de4x5 could be ported to new API(s)? I think that it's much easier 
than fixing obscure hardware-related problems like cable auto-detection.

-- 
Ondrej Zary
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/