Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » February » 25

Re: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable behavior

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: David Miller <davem@...>
To: <Steve.Hawkes@...>
Cc: <joe@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>
Subject: Re: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable behavior
Date: Monday, February 25, 2008 - 4:02 pm

From: "Hawkes Steve-FSH016" <Steve.Hawkes@motorola.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:47:11 -0600


Actually, for compile time initializations, setting
anything to zero is superfluous and by convention
is not therefore explicitly done in the sources.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable beha..., Hawkes Steve-FSH016, (Tue Feb 19, 5:30 pm)
Re: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable ..., David Miller, (Thu Feb 21, 2:32 am)
Re: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable ..., Joe Perches, (Thu Feb 21, 3:00 am)
RE: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable ..., Hawkes Steve-FSH016, (Mon Feb 25, 11:47 am)
RE: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable ..., Joe Perches, (Mon Feb 25, 4:13 pm)
Re: printk_ratelimit and net_ratelimit conflict and tunable ..., David Miller, (Mon Feb 25, 4:02 pm)