Re: [BUG + PATCH/Bugfix] x86/lguest: fix pgdir pmd index calculation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ahmed S. Darwish
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2008 - 5:18 pm

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:26:53PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:

This thread's main bug no longer appears. There's a new bug though,
but it looks nicer than the original ugly bug!. 

The new bug does *not* appear in mainline with the same patch. It's
a panic, but this time on the _guest_ side (which is the same host's
kernel).

[    0.023996] CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1500MHz stepping 05
[    0.023996] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel compiled for Pentium+, requires TSC feature!
[    0.023996] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc2-00815-g3db3a05 #64
[    0.024996]  [<c011bbc7>] panic+0x47/0x120
[    0.024996]  [<c0101b30>] lguest_power_off+0x0/0x20
[    0.024996]  [<c02a88c5>] check_bugs+0x155/0x170
[    0.024996]  [<c02a2b1f>] start_kernel+0x22f/0x2d0
[    0.024996]  [<c02a2390>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1f0
[    0.024996]  [<c0101450>] lguest_restart+0x0/0x20
[    0.024996]  [<c0101450>] lguest_restart+0x0/0x20
[    0.024996]  [<c02a5e22>] lguest_init+0x282/0x290
[    0.024996]  =======================

I'll track it further in my first free time slot.

It seems lguest is very sensitive to x86 tree changes. Could it be 
included in a sort of automatic guest-boot testing, please ?

Thank you,

-- 

"Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"

Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [BUG + PATCH/Bugfix] x86/lguest: fix pgdir pmd index c ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Feb 24, 5:18 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] lguest: sanitize the clock., Rusty Russell, (Tue Mar 4, 5:11 am)