On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
quoted text
> 2008/2/24, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>:
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > You know, with this new patch we probably don't need
> >  > > device_pm_schedule_removal() any more.
> >  >
> >  > No, we don't.  However, because of that dpm_suspend() and device_power_down()
> >  > need to be changed not to assume that the removed devices will end up on
> >  > dpm_destroy.
> >
> >
> >  with analogous changes to dpm_suspend().
> >
> >  Any more suggestions for updates?
> >
> 
> Is there any current patch I should actually test - it looks there is
> ongoing discussion from the time Rafael has proposed his last patch to
> check by me: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14961&action=view
> 
> But I think it's visible the only suspend update will not resolve my
> problems and the problems is deeper in the mmc.

Yes, there are problems in there, but your feedback is needed nevertheless.
 
quoted text
> So should I still test yesterdays' patch ?

Yes please.  It will be valuable information to us whether it fixes the suspend
issue at least.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/