Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2008 - 4:18 am

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:23:49AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

My argument is - why bother with stuff like this, why not just pass
"_name" as the string itself, rather than using the preprocessor to
turn symbols into strings thereby suffering these nasty interactions.

It's not like "_name" is used for anything other than generating a
string.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Liam Girdwood, (Wed Feb 20, 10:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Andrew Morton, (Sat Feb 23, 1:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Russell King - ARM Linux, (Sat Feb 23, 2:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Andrew Morton, (Sat Feb 23, 11:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., ian, (Sat Feb 23, 12:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Andrew Morton, (Sat Feb 23, 12:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Pavel Machek, (Sun Feb 24, 1:51 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Mark Brown, (Sun Feb 24, 3:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., Russell King - ARM Linux, (Sun Feb 24, 4:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core., ian, (Sun Feb 24, 3:47 pm)