On Sun, 24 February 2008 09:36:07 +0900, David Woodhouse wrote:
Could a naïve implementation of this get exploited by doing a large
number of truncates that just shave single bytes off various files?
Looks like the safe way to do it would be to write out a replacement
node for the truncated node, if the special case ever triggers.
Jörn
--
"[One] doesn't need to know [...] how to cause a headache in order
to take an aspirin."
-- Scott Culp, Manager of the Microsoft Security Response Center, 2001
--