Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:33:34 -0800 "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>  Looks good, except for the name uint(), can we make it u64(). Integers are 32
>>>  bit on both ILP32 and LP64, but we really read/write 64 bit values.
>> Yes, that's true. But read_uint() is more consistent with all the
>> other instances in cgroups and subsystems. So if we were to call it
>> res_counter_read_u64() I'd also want to rename all the other
>> *read_uint functions/fields to *read_u64 too. Can I do that in a
>> separate patch?
>>
> 
> Sounds sensible to me.
> 

Sure, fair enough.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/