On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:01:55 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

quoted text
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:50:35 +0000 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > The kernel NTP code shouldn't hand 64-bit *signed* values to do_div().  Make it
> > > instead hand 64-bit unsigned values.  This gets rid of a couple of warnings.
> > 
> > On certain architectures.  It would have bene nice to mention what those
> > architectures are, and to quote the warnings.  Next time, please ;)
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  kernel/time/ntp.c |   12 +++++++-----
> > 
> > Thomas, do you consider ntp to fall under git-hrt?
> 
> I'll pick it up.
> 


OK.  And this is still
git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/linux-2.6-hrt.git#mm,
yes?

Can we please define the scope of that tree?

Please review

fix-shadowed-variables-in-kernel-posix-cpu-timersc.patch
timers-simplify-lockdep-stuff.patch
hrtimers-simplify-lockdep-stuff.patch
kill-double_spin_lock.patch
ntp-make-the-kernel-ntp-code-hand-64-bit-unsigned-values-to-do_div.patch

from http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/.  I think they're
all probably git-hrt material.

Can we get that tree into linux-next too please?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/