Re: [PATCH] Make v9fs uname and remotename parsing more robust

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...>, Jim Meyering <meyering@...>
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2008 - 4:07 am

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:54:34 +0100 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:


It would be better to present this as two patches.  One adds the new core
APIs and the other uses those APIs in v9fs.  The patches would take
separate routes into mainline.

I guess I can sneak this one in as-is, as long as the v9fs guys are OK with
that?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Make v9fs uname and remotename parsing more robust, Markus Armbruster, (Fri Feb 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Make v9fs uname and remotename parsing more robust, Andrew Morton, (Sat Feb 23, 4:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] Make v9fs uname and remotename parsing more robust, Eric Van Hensbergen, (Sun Feb 24, 11:37 am)
[PATCH] 9p: Make uname and remotename parsing more robust, Markus Armbruster, (Fri Feb 22, 11:57 am)