2008/2/23, Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com> wrote:
quoted text
>
> ... blablabla
>
>  My question is: If you're working on multiple things at once, do you tend to
>  clone the entire repository repeatedly into a series of separate working
>  directories and do your work there, then pull that work (possibly comprising
>  a series of "temporary" commits) back into a separate local master
>  respository with --squash, either into "master" or into a branch containing
>  the new feature?
>
> ... blablabla
>
>  I'm using git to manage my project and I'm trying to determine the most
>  optimal workflow I can. I figure that I'm going to have an "official" master
>  repository for the project, and I want to keep the revision history clean in
>  that repository (ie, no messy intermediate commits that don't compile or only
>  implement a feature half way).

I recomend you to use these complementary tools

   1. google: gitk screenshots  ( e.g. http://lwn.net/Articles/140350/ )

   2. google: "git-gui" screenshots
         ( e.g. http://www.spearce.org/2007/01/git-gui-screenshots.html )

   3. google: gitweb color meld

   ;)
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/