On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
quoted text
>     If a patch or if a file has a clean _style_, bugs and deeper
>     structural problems often stand out like a sore thumb. But if the
>     code is peppered with random style noise, it's a lot harder (for me
>     at least) to notice real bugs. I can notice bugs in a squeeky clean
>     code base about 5 times easier than in a noisy codebase. This effect
>     alone makes checkpatch indispensible for the scheduler and for
>     arch/x86.

I also appreciate style uniformity in kernel code. My (limited)
experience with checkpatch is that most checkpatch complaints are easy
to resolve.

Bart Van Assche.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/