Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dmitry Adamushko
Date: Friday, February 22, 2008 - 1:36 am

Hi Max,


I'm puzzled by the following part (can be a misunderstanding from my side)

+config CPUISOL_STOPMACHINE
+       bool "Do not halt isolated CPUs with Stop Machine (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+       depends on CPUISOL && STOP_MACHINE && EXPERIMENTAL
+       help
+         If this option is enabled kernel will not halt isolated CPUs
+         when Stop Machine is triggered. Stop Machine is currently only
+         used by the module insertion and removal.

this "only" part. What about e.g. a 'cpu hotplug' case (_cpu_down())?
(or we should abstract it a bit to the point that e.g. a cpu can be
considered as 'a module'? :-)


-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Thu Feb 21, 7:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Dmitry Adamushko, (Fri Feb 22, 1:36 am)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Feb 22, 4:43 am)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Mark Hounschell, (Fri Feb 22, 6:38 am)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Feb 22, 6:59 am)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Fri Feb 22, 2:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Fri Feb 22, 3:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Fri Feb 22, 3:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Fri Feb 22, 3:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Feb 23, 6:05 am)
Re: [PATCH sched-devel 0/7] CPU isolation extensions, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Mon Feb 25, 7:10 pm)