Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:Indeed. Unfortunately it is orthogonal to the line length limit. We should limit the nesting level, though I think there is no universally good value. What is good for one case (a function with a short multi-level if/for/etc) is bad for another (a long switch() where any added complexity makes it unparseable). So I think it just have to meet the author's and reviewers' taste. We already depend on this. -- Krzysztof Halasa --
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Pekka Enberg | Re: [bug] mm/slab.c boot crash in -git, "kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2103!" |
| Glauber de Oliveira Costa | [PATCH 08/79] [PATCH] use identify_boot_cpu |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
