[ Linus Added to the To: since I want to hear his opinion on this issue. ]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
Is it really intended to merge drivers without _any_ kind of review?
This driver even lacks a basic "please fix the > 250 checkpatch errors" [1]
and similar low hanging fruits that could easily be spotted and then
fixed by the submitter within a short amount of time.
I see the point that it might make sense to not prevent the merging of
drivers infinitely when they have some hard-to-fix issues, but was this
really meant as an excuse for maintainers to no longer any review of
what they merge at all?
There might be worse code being submitted, but when looking at what gets
merged into Linus' tree this driver beats all other drivers I remember
in both number of stylistic problems and bugs. [2]
cu
Adrian
BTW: Greg, you are Cc'ed for your joke in [3]...
[1] not to mention the > 2000 checkpatch warnings
[2] as already said, that's not meant against the driver submitter
I'm complaining about the complete lack of review that would have
brought this driver into shape
[3] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/427
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--