Re: [RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by throttle

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: minchan Kim
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - 2:49 am

On Feb 20, 2008 6:24 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

I already adjusted it. :-)
But, In my desktop, I couldn't make to consune my swap device above
half. (My swap device is 512M size)
Because my kernel almost was hang before happening many swapping.
Perhaps, it might be a not hang.  However, Although I wait a very long
time, My box don't have a any response.
I will try do it more.


I mean I will test your patch by myself.
Because I already have a embedded board and Desktop.


I agree with you.


I didn't say your patch had a regression.
What I mean is just that I am concern about it.
Actually, Many VM guys is working on server environment.
They didn't try to do performance test in embedde system.
and that patch was submitted in mainline.

Actually, I am concern about it.


Could you send me that debug code ?
If you will send it to me, I will test it my environment (ARM-920T, Core2Duo).
And I will report test result.

-- 
Thanks,
barrios
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by throttle, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Feb 18, 10:44 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by t ..., minchan Kim, (Wed Feb 20, 2:49 am)