Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » February » 20

Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Paul Jackson <pj@...>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Cc: <riel@...>, <kosaki.motohiro@...>, <pavel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <marcelo@...>, <daniel.spang@...>, <akpm@...>, <alan@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <a1426z@...>, <jonathan@...>, <zlynx@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - 12:57 am

Kosaki-san wrote:

Did those jobs share nodes -- sometimes two or more jobs using the same
nodes?  I am sure SGI has such users too, though such job mixes make
the runtimes of specific jobs less obvious, so customers are more
tolerant of variations and some inefficiencies, as they get hidden in
the mix.

In other words, Rik, both yes and no ;).  Both sorts of HPC loads
exist, sharing nodes and a dedicated set of nodes for each job.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 9, 11:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Tue Apr 1, 7:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Apr 2, 3:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Mon Apr 14, 8:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu Apr 17, 5:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Thu Apr 17, 3:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Daniel Spång, (Wed Apr 23, 4:27 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Wed Apr 30, 10:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu May 1, 11:06 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Fri May 2, 6:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat May 3, 8:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Tue May 6, 1:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Fri Apr 18, 6:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Mon Apr 21, 4:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Apr 15, 10:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Tom May, (Wed Apr 2, 1:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Sun Feb 17, 10:49 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Feb 19, 3:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 19, 11:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Pavel Machek, (Tue Feb 19, 6:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Rik van Riel, (Tue Feb 19, 10:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 20, 12:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Feb 19, 10:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 20, 12:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Feb 20, 1:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 19, 9:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Rik van Riel, (Tue Feb 19, 3:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 19, 4:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 19, 4:43 pm)
[PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Jonathan Corbet, (Mon Feb 11, 11:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Feb 11, 11:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Jon Masters, (Sat Feb 9, 12:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 9, 12:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, Rik van Riel, (Sat Feb 9, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 9, 12:49 pm)