On Sat 2008-02-02 20:38:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> 
> * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> 
> > > It would have been easier to just use the public interface and 
> > > hard-wire "rtc0".  But going directly to the hardware was dirtier, 
> > > and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously shouldn't go upstream 
> > > until it gets done properly".
> > 
> > Yes, it was "quick and dirty". And I do not think it is going upstream 
> > in this form...?
> 
> which would be a pity - this thing _almost_ started doing suspend and 
> resume cycles on my testsystems, all by itself :-)

...which is good reason for me to create cleaned-up patch, right?

wakeup in .c now works, so I actually have time to do it now.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/