On Feb 19, 2008 3:25 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:49:15AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The Coverity checker spotted the following inconsequent NULL checking
> > introduced by commit d5f5bcd425b771c0b7ff5a650b2ce061ac8bbb87:
> >
> > <--  snip  -->
>
> It's not a real problem, that pointer can't go away.

I think he meant inconsistent not "inconsequent."

Either the test of port->tty here is unneeded:

 if (port->tty)
               port->tty->low_latency = low_latency;

...or the lack of test of port->tty here is a mistake:

	 edge_set_termios (port, port->tty->termios);
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/