Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 - 6:49 pm

On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:

- Xen is currently not supported by the kernel Debian Installer uses (though 
work is being done to change that.
- KVM AFAIK requires hardware support that I don't have.
- QEMU is completely useless because of its slow speed without the (also out 
of tree) kqemu module, which does not work when the host system is x86_64 
[1]. Also, I very much prefer the VirtualBox user interface over what qemu 
has to offer.
- I've actually used VMWare for a long time (licenced), but stopped after 
the 5 series stopped working with current kernels and around that time 
VirtualBox became available as an alternative.

Hope that explains.

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/444160
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Sun Feb 17, 5:25 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Feb 17, 4:46 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 8:31 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 12:50 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 1:11 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 1:32 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Roland Dreier, (Mon Feb 18, 2:53 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 3:07 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Roland Dreier, (Mon Feb 18, 3:18 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Siddha, Suresh B, (Tue Feb 19, 3:42 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Alan Cox, (Mon Feb 18, 2:40 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 2:52 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Alan Cox, (Mon Feb 18, 4:15 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 2:52 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Feb 18, 3:18 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Tue Feb 19, 5:35 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 2:32 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 9:16 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 5:55 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Feb 19, 6:19 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 6:49 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Feb 19, 6:15 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Feb 19, 5:59 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Feb 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, David Miller, (Sun Feb 17, 10:33 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 8:27 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Tilman Schmidt, (Mon Feb 18, 7:40 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 3:44 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Paul Jackson, (Sun Feb 17, 4:38 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Feb 17, 4:51 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 6:41 pm)