On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:55:01 +0100
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:

quoted text
> On Sunday 17 February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The real problem is that the kernel seems to lack functionality you
> > require for doing some work.
> 
> Not sure how you reached that conclusion.
> 
> > Why does your work on the Debian Installer depend on VirtualBox and
> > can't be done with what the kernel already ships?
> 
> Work on the installer does not so much hard depend on VirtualBox (or
> any other emulator), but can be done much more effectively and
> efficiently using one.
> 
> It allows me to run the installer inside the emulator without the
> need for a second computer (and using the same keyboard). It allows
> me to take snapshots just before stages I'm interested in and then
> add debugging or try changes. If what I tried does not work, I can
> just revert to the snapshot and try something else without having to
> run the full installation from scratch. It allows me to easily test
> RAID setups without having multiple physical disks. Etc.
> 
> The fact that VirtualBox does not (yet) work for me with 2.6.25 means
> that I'm unable to run 2.6.25 on my main desktop and do any real
> work. Rebooting my desktop whenever I want to use VirtualBox is just
> not a realistic option.
> That in turn means that I cannot do any more testing of 2.6.25,

I assume you've read the other mails right and went to the virtualbox form
to get the small patch to make it work on .25 right?


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/