Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 6:54 pm

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

SSION

I have already fixed this one, and fix has been already picked by Linus=20
from my tree, so you can drop this one. (even the bugzilla is closed=20
properly).


The kernel version seems to be a little bit bogus here :)

[ ... ]

These two are the same bug. I think we really need 45b503548 reverted in=20
mainline.


Looks like this is issue with CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED. Waiting for Peter's=20
feedback.

BTW it would be nice to receive CC in the bugzilla, when I have Handled-by=
=20
on that bug :) (but hey, I know that it is difficult to track all the=20
persons addressess, when they are not using them consistently).

 to

Thanks a lot Rafael for this regression tracking.

BTW I think it might still be useful to CC everyone involved on these=20
reports, even though the bugzillas probably have the correct addressess=20
already.

Thanks,

--=20
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Feb 17, 6:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Dhaval Giani, (Mon Feb 18, 6:17 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Feb 18, 7:38 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jiri Slaby, (Mon Feb 18, 4:52 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Feb 18, 5:43 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Feb 18, 5:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jiri Slaby, (Mon Feb 18, 5:59 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Feb 18, 7:35 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Feb 18, 9:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Alexey Dobriyan, (Mon Feb 18, 6:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Carlos Eduardo Medaglia Dyonisio..., (Mon Feb 18, 3:02 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Feb 18, 7:27 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Carlos E. M. Dyonisio, (Mon Feb 18, 9:01 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 1:37 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Feb 18, 7:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 12:51 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jiri Kosina, (Sun Feb 17, 6:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Feb 17, 7:06 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 7:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Mariusz Kozlowski, (Sun Feb 17, 7:06 pm)