Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 4:46 pm

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:25:30 +0100
Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:


the initial plan was for a depreciation period. Sadly it was untenable since the API
was changing entirely to fix bugs and add a really important feature
(the ability to clflush the exact range rather than wbinvd'ing the caches of all cpus in the system), 
at which point we had to pull the function right away.

As for virtualbox; a fix for that already exists, and it consists of removing 25 lines of workarounds
for c-p-a bugs, and just using set_memory_x / set_memory_nx.



-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Sun Feb 17, 5:25 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Feb 17, 4:46 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 8:31 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 12:50 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 1:11 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 1:32 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Roland Dreier, (Mon Feb 18, 2:53 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 3:07 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Roland Dreier, (Mon Feb 18, 3:18 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Siddha, Suresh B, (Tue Feb 19, 3:42 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Alan Cox, (Mon Feb 18, 2:40 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 2:52 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Alan Cox, (Mon Feb 18, 4:15 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 2:52 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Feb 18, 3:18 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Tue Feb 19, 5:35 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 2:32 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 9:16 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 5:55 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Feb 19, 6:19 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 6:49 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Feb 19, 6:15 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Feb 19, 5:59 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Feb 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, David Miller, (Sun Feb 17, 10:33 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 8:27 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Tilman Schmidt, (Mon Feb 18, 7:40 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 3:44 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Paul Jackson, (Sun Feb 17, 4:38 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Feb 17, 4:51 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 6:41 pm)