Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 3:24 pm

Am 17.02.2008 14:16 schrieb Adrian Bunk:

No, that's not the real problem. Even if the kernel didn't lack
any required functionality and it could all be done today without
VirtualBox, pulling the rug from underneath it like that leaves
all those who are currently relying on it without the ability to
continue testing newer kernels until they find the time to redesign
their working environment. Sticking to the removal schedule could
have avoided that.

HTH
T.

--=20
Tilman Schmidt                          E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Unge=C3=B6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=C3=BCckseite)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Sun Feb 17, 5:25 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Feb 17, 4:46 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 8:31 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 12:50 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 1:11 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 1:32 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Roland Dreier, (Mon Feb 18, 2:53 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 3:07 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Roland Dreier, (Mon Feb 18, 3:18 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Siddha, Suresh B, (Tue Feb 19, 3:42 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Alan Cox, (Mon Feb 18, 2:40 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 2:52 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Alan Cox, (Mon Feb 18, 4:15 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 2:52 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Feb 18, 3:18 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Tue Feb 19, 5:35 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Feb 18, 2:32 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 9:16 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 5:55 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Feb 19, 6:19 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 6:49 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Feb 19, 6:15 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Feb 19, 5:59 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Tilman Schmidt, (Sun Feb 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, David Miller, (Sun Feb 17, 10:33 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Mon Feb 18, 8:27 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Tilman Schmidt, (Mon Feb 18, 7:40 am)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Feb 17, 3:44 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Paul Jackson, (Sun Feb 17, 4:38 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Feb 17, 4:51 pm)
Re: Unable to continue testing of 2.6.25, Frans Pop, (Tue Feb 19, 6:41 pm)