login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
17
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
To: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources
Date: Sunday, February 17, 2008 - 10:06 am
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
quoted text
> From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> > > This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved > motherboard resources. If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in > ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table. The PCI Express firmware > spec apparently tells BIOS developers that reservation in ACPI is required > and E820 reservation is optional, so checking against ACPI first makes > sense. Many BIOSes don't reserve the MMCONFIG region in E820 even though > it is perfectly functional, the existing check needlessly disables MMCONFIG > in these cases. > > In order to do this, MMCONFIG setup has been split into two phases. If PCI > configuration type 1 is not available then MMCONFIG is enabled early as > before. Otherwise, it is enabled later after the ACPI interpreter is > enabled, since we need to be able to execute control methods in order to > check the ACPI reserved resources. Presently this is just triggered off > the end of ACPI interpreter initialization. > > There are a few other behavioral changes here: > > - Validate all MMCONFIG configurations provided, not just the first one. > > - Validate the entire required length of each configuration according to > the provided ending bus number is reserved, not just the minimum required > allocation. > > - Validate that the area is reserved even if we read it from the chipset > directly and not from the MCFG table. This catches the case where the > BIOS didn't set the location properly in the chipset and has mapped it > over other things it shouldn't have. > > This also cleans up the MMCONFIG initialization functions so that they > simply do nothing if MMCONFIG is not compiled in. > > Based on an original patch by Rajesh Shah from Intel.
Applied. Thanks, tglx --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 5:27 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resou...
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Sun Feb 17, 10:06 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resou...
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Feb 15, 7:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resou...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 6:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resou...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 6:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: validate against acpi motherboard resou...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 2:46 pm)
[PATCH 2/5] x86: clear pci_mmcfg_virt when mmcfg get rejected
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 5:28 am)
[PATCH 3/5] x86: mmconf enable mcfg early
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 5:30 am)
[PATCH 4/5] x86_64: check msr to get mmconfig for amd family...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 5:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86_64: check msr to get mmconfig for amd fa...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Mon Feb 18, 11:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86_64: check msr to get mmconfig for amd fa...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Feb 19, 6:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86_64: check msr to get mmconfig for amd fa...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Tue Feb 19, 6:39 am)
[PATCH 5/5] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Fri Feb 15, 5:32 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Theodore Tso
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
Christoph Hellwig
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan...
Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Wenji Wu
RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
7 users
and
876 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
familyguyqzxli
countyjailinma
vv_ivango
calemonlawbjga
alanmaguire
summerspring
Syndicate