[PATCH][2.6.25-rc2] Fix double lock in do_setlink introduced by 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <netdev@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Laszlo Attila Toth <panther@...>
Date: Saturday, February 16, 2008 - 7:57 pm

[   58.097923] =============================================
[   58.098883] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   58.099603] 2.6.25-rc2-1avb #1
[   58.100013] ---------------------------------------------
[   58.100672] wpa_supplicant/2682 is trying to acquire lock:
[   58.100672]  (dev_base_lock){-.--}, at: [<c0278697>] do_setlink+0x327/0x3
[   58.100672]
[   58.100672] but task is already holding lock:
[   58.100672]  (dev_base_lock){-.--}, at: [<c0278680>] do_setlink+0x310/0x3

with final effect

[   58.537509] Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!

Signed-off-by: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>

---

 net/core/rtnetlink.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index ecb02af..dd9e4da 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ static int do_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
 		if (dev->link_mode != nla_get_u8(tb[IFLA_LINKMODE])) {
 			write_lock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
 			dev->link_mode = nla_get_u8(tb[IFLA_LINKMODE]);
-			write_lock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
+			write_unlock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
 			modified = 1;
 		}
 	}
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH][2.6.25-rc2] Fix double lock in do_setlink introduced..., Andrey Borzenkov, (Sat Feb 16, 7:57 pm)