On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:04:37AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text
> > diff --git a/fs/sysv/sysv.h b/fs/sysv/sysv.h
> > index 42d51d1..38ebe3f 100644
> > --- a/fs/sysv/sysv.h
> > +++ b/fs/sysv/sysv.h
> > @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static inline __fs32 fs32_add(struct sysv_sb_info *sbi, __fs32 *n, int d)
> >  	if (sbi->s_bytesex == BYTESEX_PDP)
> >  		*(__u32*)n = PDP_swab(PDP_swab(*(__u32*)n)+d);
> >  	else if (sbi->s_bytesex == BYTESEX_LE)
> > -		*(__le32*)n = cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(*(__le32*)n)+d);
> > +		le32_add_cpu((__le32 *)n, d);
> >  	else
> > -		*(__be32*)n = cpu_to_be32(be32_to_cpu(*(__be32*)n)+d);
> > +		be32_add_cpu((__be32 *)n, d);
> >  	return *n;
> 
> but now that you've named the be and le primitives *_add_cpu it would
> be nice if you could submit a second patch to sysv to rename fs*_add
> to fs*_add_cpu aswell.

Btw, the same applies to ufs aswell as it's using the same construct.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/