It is OK to let access() go without using a mnt_want/drop_write() pair because it doesn't actually do writes to the filesystem, and it is inherently racy anyway. This is a rare case when it is OK to use __mnt_is_readonly() directly. Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/open.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -puN fs/open.c~r-o-bind-mounts-make-access-use-mnt-check fs/open.c --- linux-2.6.git/fs/open.c~r-o-bind-mounts-make-access-use-mnt-check 2008-02-15 13:25:57.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.git-dave/fs/open.c 2008-02-15 13:25:57.000000000 -0800 @@ -459,8 +459,17 @@ asmlinkage long sys_faccessat(int dfd, c if(res || !(mode & S_IWOTH) || special_file(nd.path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode)) goto out_path_release; - - if(IS_RDONLY(nd.path.dentry->d_inode)) + /* + * This is a rare case where using __mnt_is_readonly() + * is OK without a mnt_want/drop_write() pair. Since + * no actual write to the fs is performed here, we do + * not need to telegraph to that to anyone. + * + * By doing this, we accept that this access is + * inherently racy and know that the fs may change + * state before we even see this result. + */ + if (__mnt_is_readonly(nd.path.mnt)) res = -EROFS; out_path_release: _ --
| Tony Lindgren | [PATCH 26/90] ARM: OMAP: abstract debug card setup (smc, leds) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jesper Juhl | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
