login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
15
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Greg KH
Subject:
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
Date: Friday, February 15, 2008 - 11:28 am
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:31:40PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:08AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:48:27AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > > In conclusion, our usage doesn't seem lika a good fit for the probe > > > approach, although it could probably converted provided we got the > > > ordering right with regards to regular PCI device > > > initialization. Doesn't seem to be worth the effort. > > > > After reading this, and looking at the code again, I agree. Thanks for > > the great explaination, I'll leave the code alone now :) > > Copy the nice explanation from the mail into the code as a comment > somewhere?
That would be nice. Muli, want to make a patch for this? thanks, greg k-h --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 5:15 pm)
pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 5:16 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Feb 12, 6:41 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Feb 12, 7:17 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Ken Moffat
, (Tue Feb 12, 7:43 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 9:43 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 9:44 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 9:45 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Dirk GOUDERS
, (Wed Feb 13, 12:54 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:26 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Dirk GOUDERS
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:54 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Wed Feb 13, 2:32 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:06 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Michael Ellerman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:16 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:34 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:46 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:57 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Ken Moffat
, (Wed Feb 13, 8:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 10:28 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 10:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Wed Feb 13, 10:47 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 11:14 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 11:16 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Dirk GOUDERS
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:00 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:48 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Wed Feb 13, 3:20 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Michael Ellerman
, (Wed Feb 13, 3:39 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 4:41 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:02 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 9:58 pm)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Andreas Jaeger
, (Thu Feb 14, 12:44 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Thu Feb 14, 5:11 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Sergei Shtylyov
, (Thu Feb 14, 6:09 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Bill Davidsen
, (Thu Feb 14, 10:16 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 12:17 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 12:17 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Fri Feb 15, 12:48 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Feb 15, 6:58 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 8:20 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Fri Feb 15, 8:31 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, yong xue
, (Fri Feb 15, 8:46 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 11:28 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Sun Feb 17, 12:53 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Ken Moffat
, (Tue Feb 19, 8:08 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 19, 5:39 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Michael Trimarchi
Re: [PATCH] VFS: make file->f_pos access atomic on 32bit arch
Miklos Szeredi
[patch 14/15] vfs: more path_permission() conversions
Serge E. Hallyn
Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 7/8] Infrastructure for shared objects
Bernd Schmidt
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Takashi Iwai
[PATCH 2/2] input: Add LED support to Synaptics device
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Eyvind Bernhardsen
Re: Where has "git ls-remote" reference pattern matching gone?
Shawn O. Pearce
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Todd Zullinger
Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: rfc2047-quote subject lines with non-ascii characters
Santi Béjar
Re: How to use git-fmt-merge-msg?
linux-netdev
:
Ramkrishna Vepa
[net-2.6 PATCH 1/10] Neterion: New driver: Driver help file
Mark Anthony
invitation / inquiry
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 08/16] dma-debug: add core checking functions
David Miller
Re: [PATCH 1/3] f_phonet: dev_kfree_skb instead of dev_kfree_skb_any in TX callback
Sascha Hauer
[PATCH 03/12] fec: do not typedef struct types
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
amba: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Yosemite: Convert SMP startup lock to arch spinlock.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: S5PC100: IRQ and timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
davinci: edma: clear interrupt status for interrupt enabled channels only
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, mm, kprobes: fault.c, simplify notify_page_fault()
openbsd-misc
:
Daniel A. Ramaley
Re: [semi-OT] Can anyone recommend an OpenBSD-compatible colour laser printer?
Matthias Kilian
Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv
Tobias Ulmer
Re: Problem after upgrade 4.5 to 4.6: ERR M
Philip Guenther
Re: SIGCHLD and libpthread.so
J.C. Roberts
Re: [semi-OT] Can anyone recommend an OpenBSD-compatible colour laser printer?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate