Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <clameter@...>, <Lee.Schermerhorn@...>, <ak@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, February 15, 2008 - 5:27 am

David wrote:

I don't think so.  It's not possible to detemine if exactly the low
eight bits of the 'policy' short are a valid mode, -however- that
"eight" is a spurious detail.  Remove it.

Instead of specifying that the 'policy' short consists of two bytes,
one for mode and one for flags, rather specify that the policy fields
consists of some high bits for flags, and the remaining low bits
(however many remain) for the mode.

That in turn exposes the opportunity to remove a couple of checks
for "(mpol_flags(mode) & ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS)" being zero, and that
in turn makes it obvious that the 'flags' variable in
sys_set_mempolicy() is unused.

Consider the following patch, on top of the latest you sent me a day
ago.

---
 include/linux/mempolicy.h |   26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 mm/mempolicy.c            |    6 ------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.24-mm1.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2008-02-15 00:11:10.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.24-mm1/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2008-02-15 01:13:51.597894429 -0800
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@
  * Copyright 2003,2004 Andi Kleen SuSE Labs
  */
 
+/*
+ * The 'policy' field of 'struct mempolicy' has both a mode and
+ * some flags packed into it.  The flags (MPOL_F_* below) occupy
+ * the high bit positions (MPOL_MODE_FLAGS), and the mempolicy
+ * modes (the "Policies" below) are encoded in the remaining low
+ * bit positions.
+ */
+
 /* Policies */
 enum {
 	MPOL_DEFAULT,
@@ -18,16 +26,12 @@ enum {
 };
 
 /*
- * The lower MPOL_FLAG_SHIFT bits of the policy mode represent the MPOL_*
- * constants defined in the above enum.  The upper bits represent optional
- * set_mempolicy() or mbind() MPOL_F_* mode flags.
+ * Optional flags that modify nodemask numbering.
  */
-#define MPOL_FLAG_SHIFT		(8)
-#define MPOL_MODE_MASK		((1 << MPOL_FLAG_SHIFT) - 1)
-
-/* Flags for set_mempolicy */
-#define MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES	(1 << MPOL_FLAG_SHIFT)
-#define MPOL_MODE_FLAGS		(MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES)	/* legal set_mempolicy() MPOL_F_* flags */
+#define MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES (1<<14)		/* remapped relative to cpuset */
+#define MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES (1<<15)		/* unremapped physical masks */
+#define MPOL_MODE_FLAGS (MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES|MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES)
+						/* combined MPOL_F_* mask flags */
 
 /* Flags for get_mempolicy */
 #define MPOL_F_NODE	(1<<0)	/* return next IL mode instead of node mask */
@@ -130,12 +134,12 @@ static inline int mpol_equal(struct memp
 
 static inline unsigned char mpol_mode(unsigned short mode)
 {
-	return mode & MPOL_MODE_MASK;
+	return mode & ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned short mpol_flags(unsigned short mode)
 {
-	return mode & ~MPOL_MODE_MASK;
+	return mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
 }
 
 /*
--- 2.6.24-mm1.orig/mm/mempolicy.c	2008-02-15 00:18:35.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.24-mm1/mm/mempolicy.c	2008-02-15 01:23:53.775748002 -0800
@@ -884,8 +884,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mbind(unsigned long 
 
 	if (mpol_mode(mode) >= MPOL_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (mpol_flags(mode) & ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS)
-		return -EINVAL;
 	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -898,13 +896,9 @@ asmlinkage long sys_set_mempolicy(int mo
 {
 	int err;
 	nodemask_t nodes;
-	unsigned short flags;
 
 	if (mpol_mode(mode) >= MPOL_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	if (mpol_flags(mode) & ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS)
-		return -EINVAL;
-	flags = mpol_flags(mode) & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
 	err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode);
 	if (err)
 		return err;


-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 11:30 am)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 12, 8:10 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Feb 12, 9:04 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 10:00 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 12, 10:22 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 10:42 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 12, 10:59 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 11:17 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 12, 11:22 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 8:53 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Feb 11, 3:32 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 3:40 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Feb 11, 3:48 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 4:02 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Feb 11, 4:45 pm)
[patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 11:30 am)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 12, 8:14 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 8:25 pm)
[patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 11:30 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Thu Feb 14, 6:09 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Thu Feb 14, 5:38 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Fri Feb 15, 5:27 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Fri Feb 15, 4:23 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Fri Feb 15, 7:45 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Fri Feb 15, 7:55 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Fri Feb 15, 8:11 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Fri Feb 15, 4:32 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Thu Feb 14, 3:40 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Thu Feb 14, 9:44 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Fri Feb 15, 6:00 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 12, 8:22 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 12:18 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 13, 12:14 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 3:12 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 1:06 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 13, 11:15 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Tue Feb 12, 11:52 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 12:03 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 13, 12:13 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 12:23 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 13, 4:03 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 5:36 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 13, 1:04 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 3:02 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 13, 4:29 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Thu Feb 14, 6:26 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Thu Feb 14, 3:45 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Fri Feb 15, 6:19 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Fri Feb 15, 4:14 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 5:35 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Thu Feb 14, 8:27 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Thu Feb 14, 7:12 am)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 13, 12:01 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 2:48 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Lee Schermerhorn, (Wed Feb 13, 3:05 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Wed Feb 13, 3:17 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 13, 2:58 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Feb 11, 3:34 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Feb 11, 2:25 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 3:56 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 12, 8:25 pm)
Re: [patch 3/4] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 8:57 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, Lee Schermerhorn, (Mon Feb 11, 12:36 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 3:34 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, Lee Schermerhorn, (Tue Feb 12, 11:31 am)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, David Rientjes, (Tue Feb 12, 3:14 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, Paul Jackson, (Mon Feb 11, 4:55 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 5:52 pm)
Re: [patch 2/4] mempolicy: support optional mode flags, Paul Jackson, (Mon Feb 11, 5:57 pm)
Re: [patch 1/4] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum, David Rientjes, (Mon Feb 11, 3:25 pm)