Re: [2.6 patch] let DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH depend on BROKEN

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, February 15, 2008 - 3:40 am

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:33:06AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

BROKEN is our pattern for "intentionally disabled".

I did really grep for UNDEFINED when I first saw it since it might as 
well have been some kind of CONFIG_UNDEFINED "warn about undefined foobar".


cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [2.6 patch] let DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Feb 15, 3:40 am)