On Thursday 14 February 2008 04:14:45 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:That makes sense, but ... there are BIOSes that actually list nested resources, e.g., http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514#c29 : [000000290 - 000000294] Motherboard resources [000000290 - 00000029F] Motherboard resources We'd have to make sure we don't start with the 0x290-0x294 resource, because then we'll fail when we try to reserve 0x290-0x29f, and we really should avoid using the 0x295-0x2f9 piece as well. And even if we do figure out the "outermost" resources, I'd worry that some BIOS will have separate ACPI devices that have overlapping resources. Then Murphy's Law says that we'll find the device with the smaller resource first, reserve it, then find a device with an enclosing resource, and leave something unreserved. Maybe that's still better than a quirk; I don't know. I guess it's pretty ugly either way. Bjorn --
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Jon Smirl | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
