Hi Russell, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:14:05 +0000 Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>= wrote:ct Correct. one t. This is exactly what I suggested (or meant to) *except* that I want it to only apply to the stable branch. I intend that the stable branch of linux-next will never be rebased and so is suitable for others to base their trees off. The master branch will be continually rebased as the subsystem trees change over time. Originally, I assumed the stable branch would be for our "usual" API changes, but it appears we are not having any more of those. :-) However, I see an argument for attempting to stabilise possible conflicting changes get Linus' review/ack and add them to the stable branch. Linus suggested that such changes should go into an independent tree that everyone could pull into their trees with the full confidence that that tree would be merged into Linus' tree when the merge window opens. I am suggesting that that tree be the stable branch of linux-next. I know I haven't thought through all the consequences of this, so discussion is encouaged. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Andi Kleen | Re: [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stoyan Gaydarov | From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
git: | |
| Elijah Newren | Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete bi... |
| Matthieu Moy | git push to a non-bare repository |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: Git as a filesystem |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status |
| Theo de Raadt | Re: hardware needed for network stack performance work |
| Marcus Andree | Re: Cyrus IMAP performance problems [Long] |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10473] New: Infinite loop "b44: eth0: powering down PHY" |
| John Rigby | [PATCH] [Rev2] MPC5121 FEC support |
| Pekka Enberg | Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE_ALIGN alignment |
| Ilpo Järvinen | [PATCH] [TCP]: Separate lost_retrans loop into own function |
