login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
13
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Greg KH
Subject:
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 - 1:48 pm
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:00:15PM +0100, Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
quoted text
> > > Hm, so, to summarize: > > - you needed this option many years ago to get a box to work properly > > - you don't need this today > > > > So, if the option went away, you would not be inconvenienced? > > After having reanimated the old system and after comments of other > persons I would not be inconvenienced if the option went away. > > The system indeed did not boot correctly without that option, because > the disks appeared in a wrong order. On the other hand, I was able to > (re)install bootloaders (grub as well as lilo) and after that did not > need the option any more. Unfortunately, after that I was not able to > reproduce the initial situation where the option was needed.
Great, thanks a lot for testing this, and letting us know. greg k-h --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 5:15 pm)
pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 5:16 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Tue Feb 12, 6:41 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Alan Cox
, (Tue Feb 12, 7:17 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Ken Moffat
, (Tue Feb 12, 7:43 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 9:43 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 9:44 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 12, 9:45 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Dirk GOUDERS
, (Wed Feb 13, 12:54 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:26 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Dirk GOUDERS
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:54 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Wed Feb 13, 2:32 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:06 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Michael Ellerman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:16 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:34 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:46 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Rene Herman
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:57 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Ken Moffat
, (Wed Feb 13, 8:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 10:28 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 10:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Wed Feb 13, 10:47 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 11:14 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 11:16 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Dirk GOUDERS
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:00 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 1:48 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Wed Feb 13, 3:20 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Michael Ellerman
, (Wed Feb 13, 3:39 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 4:41 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Wed Feb 13, 5:02 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Wed Feb 13, 9:58 pm)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Andreas Jaeger
, (Thu Feb 14, 12:44 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Thu Feb 14, 5:11 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Sergei Shtylyov
, (Thu Feb 14, 6:09 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Bill Davidsen
, (Thu Feb 14, 10:16 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 12:17 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 12:17 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Fri Feb 15, 12:48 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Feb 15, 6:58 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 8:20 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Fri Feb 15, 8:31 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, yong xue
, (Fri Feb 15, 8:46 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Greg KH
, (Fri Feb 15, 11:28 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?
, Muli Ben-Yehuda
, (Sun Feb 17, 12:53 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?
, Ken Moffat
, (Tue Feb 19, 8:08 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ...
, Greg KH
, (Tue Feb 19, 5:39 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
FUJITA Tomonori
Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #11287] Regression in 2.6.27-rc2 in acpi_processor_init()
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH] x86: silence section mismatch warning - uv_cpu_init
Ingo Molnar
Re: [GIT PULL] time.c - respin
Paul E. McKenney
Re: [PATCH, RFC] v7 scalable classic RCU implementation
git
:
Mark Junker
git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-svnimport
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] Detached HEAD (experimental)
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix approxidate("never") to always return 0
A Large Angry SCM
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
linux-netdev
:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Re: [PATCH 06/37] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 1/5] dccp: Initialisation framework for feature negotiation
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 37/37] dccp: Debugging functions for feature negotiation
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k_htc: Allocate URBs properly
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/kexec: Add support for FSL-BookE
Linux Kernel Mailing List
timer: Try to survive timer callback preempt_count leak
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (8976): af9015: Add USB ID for AVerMedia A309
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5670/1: bcmring: add default configuration for bcmring arch
openbsd-misc
:
Stephen J. Bevan
GRE over IPsec
Christophe Rioux
Implementation example of snmp
Nick Holland
Re: booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom
Cabillot Julien
Re: OpenBSD isakmpd and pf vs Cisco PIX or ASA
Guido Tschakert
Re: what exactly is enc0?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate