On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:45 -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
I'm not necessarily arguing against that. However, what you're
providing is slightly more than just a userspace tap into the enclosure.
You're adding a file to display and control the enclosure state
(sw_activity). This constitutes an ad-hoc sysfs interface. I'm not
telling you not to do it, but I am pleading that if we have to have all
these sysfs interfaces, lets at least do it in a uniform way.
Enclosures are such nasty beasts, that even the job of getting a tap
into them is problematic, so if we have a different tap infrastructure
for every different enclosure type and connection it's still going to be
pretty unmanageable to a userspace interface.
James
--