Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Greg KH <greg@...>
Cc: <bzolnier@...>, <muli@...>, <jdmason@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-pci@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <discuss@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 - 8:57 am

On 13-02-08 13:06, Rene Herman wrote:

Allow me to add that the demise of drivers/ide itself is an argument for 
just shooting the thing if it helps clean up the API. Next year when I'm 
messing with that Promise controller again, the machine might very well be 
running a kernel using PATA instead of IDE anyway...

Rene.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 12, 8:15 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? , Dirk GOUDERS, (Wed Feb 13, 3:54 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? , Dirk GOUDERS, (Wed Feb 13, 4:00 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? , Dirk GOUDERS, (Wed Feb 13, 4:54 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Tue Feb 12, 10:43 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Wed Feb 13, 12:43 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Wed Feb 13, 11:32 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Tue Feb 19, 11:08 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Tue Feb 12, 9:41 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Wed Feb 13, 12:44 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Feb 14, 1:16 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Feb 15, 9:58 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:06 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:57 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:16 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:46 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman, (Wed Feb 13, 6:39 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Wed Feb 13, 5:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Wed Feb 13, 1:47 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Fri Feb 15, 3:48 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sam Ravnborg, (Fri Feb 15, 11:31 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Sun Feb 17, 3:53 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Wed Feb 13, 8:34 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary nee..., Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Thu Feb 14, 8:11 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Wed Feb 13, 6:20 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sergei Shtylyov, (Thu Feb 14, 9:09 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Wed Feb 13, 8:02 pm)