Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rene Herman
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 - 5:06 am

On 13-02-08 05:44, Greg KH wrote:


No. The thing is that you need these kinds of hacks while messing with old 
systems, building and stripping them, often in recovery type of situations.

As said (same as the other person I saw reacting) details of what was most 
decidedly needed last time around escape me at the moment, but ide=reverse 
is the kind of hack that saves one hours of unscrewing computer cases and 
switching disks around while building stuff, making quick tests, doing 
recovery...

If it must go for the greater architectural good, so be it, but it's the 
type of thing that's used specifically in the situations where you don't 
have stable, well arranged (or known!) setups to begin with.

Rene.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 12, 5:15 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Tue Feb 12, 6:41 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Tue Feb 12, 7:43 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Wed Feb 13, 2:32 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 5:06 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman, (Wed Feb 13, 5:16 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Wed Feb 13, 5:34 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 5:46 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 5:57 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Wed Feb 13, 8:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Wed Feb 13, 10:47 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Wed Feb 13, 3:20 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman, (Wed Feb 13, 3:39 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Wed Feb 13, 5:02 pm)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary n ..., Bartlomiej Zolnierki ..., (Thu Feb 14, 5:11 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sergei Shtylyov, (Thu Feb 14, 6:09 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Feb 14, 10:16 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Fri Feb 15, 12:48 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Feb 15, 6:58 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Sun Feb 17, 12:53 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Tue Feb 19, 8:08 am)