On Wednesday 13 February 2008 17:06, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
quoted text
> Nick Piggin wrote:

quoted text
> > But don't let me dissuade you from making these good improvements
> > to Linux as well :) Just that it isn't really going to be hard-rt
> > in general.
>
> Actually that's the cool thing about CPU isolation. Get rid of all latency
> sources from the CPU(s) and you get youself as hard-RT as it gets.

Hmm, maybe. Removing all sources of latency from the CPU kind of
implies that you have to audit the whole kernel for source of
latency.

quoted text
> I mean I _already_ have multi-core hard-RT systems that show ~1.2 usec
> worst case and ~200nsec average latency. I do not even need Adeos/Xenomai
> or Preemp-RT just a few very small patches. And it can be used for non RT
> stuff too.

OK, but you then are very restricted in what you can do, and easily
can break it especially if you run any userspace on that CPU. If
you just run a kernel module that, after setup, doesn't use any
other kernel resources except interrupt handling, then you might be
OK (depending on whether even interrupt handling can run into
contended locks)...

If you started doing very much more, then you can easily run into
trouble.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/