On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:57:19 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:One of the things which linux-next could/should do is to help weed out the silly build breaks, typos, missing documentation updates, missed checkpatch opportunities, etc, etc. As well as real bugs. So it would not be efficient for David to do all this queue-cleaning *prior* to putting the tree into linux-next, because more stuff will pop up anyway. So perhaps a better workflow would be keep the linux-next trees all messy, and then each developer can consolidate, rebase, join and drop things prior to sending their individual trees to Linus. If so, then git could perhaps help, by retaining sufficient metadata for the maintainer to track the fact that this-patch-here fixes that-patch-there. --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ingo Molnar | [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
