Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Greg KH <greg@...>
Cc: <bzolnier@...>, <muli@...>, <jdmason@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-pci@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <discuss@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 - 9:41 pm

On 13-02-08 01:15, Greg KH wrote:


While details escape me somewhat again at the monment, a few months ago I 
was playing around with a PCI Promise IDE controller and needed ide=reverse 
to save me from having to switch disks around to still have a bootable system.

Or some such. Not too clear anymore, but I remember it saved the day.

Rene.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
"ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Tue Feb 12, 8:15 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? , Dirk GOUDERS, (Wed Feb 13, 3:54 am)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? , Dirk GOUDERS, (Wed Feb 13, 4:00 pm)
Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? , Dirk GOUDERS, (Wed Feb 13, 4:54 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Tue Feb 12, 10:43 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Wed Feb 13, 12:43 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Wed Feb 13, 11:32 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Ken Moffat, (Tue Feb 19, 11:08 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Tue Feb 12, 9:41 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Greg KH, (Wed Feb 13, 12:44 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Bill Davidsen, (Thu Feb 14, 1:16 pm)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Feb 15, 9:58 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:06 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:57 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:16 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Rene Herman, (Wed Feb 13, 8:46 am)
Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this?, Michael Ellerman, (Wed Feb 13, 6:39 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Wed Feb 13, 5:32 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Wed Feb 13, 1:47 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Fri Feb 15, 3:48 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sam Ravnborg, (Fri Feb 15, 11:31 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Muli Ben-Yehuda, (Sun Feb 17, 3:53 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Wed Feb 13, 8:34 am)
Re: [discuss] pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary nee..., Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Thu Feb 14, 8:11 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Wed Feb 13, 6:20 pm)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Sergei Shtylyov, (Thu Feb 14, 9:09 am)
Re: pci_get_device_reverse(), why does Calgary need this?, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Wed Feb 13, 8:02 pm)