Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@...>, Linux-Xfs <linux-xfs@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 - 5:44 pm

Eric Sandeen wrote:
----
	But but but...almost from the day they were introduced.  And
these are more recent probs. Has stack usage increased for some reason,
:-(.  I do have the option to detect stack-overflow turned on as well
-- guess it doesn't work so well?

	If they are that problematic, maybe selecting xfs as a config
option should force 8k stacks (ugly solution, but might eliminate
some lost hair (from pulling it out) for end users....?

	Guess I should go back to 8k's for now...seems odd that it'd
pop up now, but maybe it's the xtra NFS loading?  Sigh.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, Linda Walsh, (Mon Feb 11, 9:02 pm)
Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, David Chinner, (Tue Feb 12, 4:58 am)
Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, Linda Walsh, (Tue Feb 12, 5:02 pm)
Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, David Chinner, (Tue Feb 12, 5:59 pm)
Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, Eric Sandeen, (Tue Feb 12, 5:24 pm)
Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, Linda Walsh, (Tue Feb 12, 5:44 pm)
Re: xfs [_fsr] probs in 2.6.24.0, Eric Sandeen, (Tue Feb 12, 5:54 pm)