On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:20:10AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:Note I wrote the one above only as a reply to Linus' proposal, not because I was advocating "live debugging" (or rather I think if you want that just use gdb vmlinux /proc/kcore) I agree with you in principle, but what do you do if one of the CPUs doesn't answer? Ingo seems to think it's ok for the debugger then to just hang too, I think it should eventually time out and debug anyways. Also there are some limits on how much the system should be frozen down. For example if you're strict about this requirement you would need to require full DMA quiescence (like kexec does). But that's obvious not a good idea for the debugger. So it's always shades of gray, not black/white. What I find strange with the current patch is that it goes to extreme measures to stop the CPUs (will hang forever), but not do the whole thing (DMA quiescence too) -Andi --
| Mark Lord | Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7 |
| Kentaro Takeda | [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions. |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: Linux v2.6.24-rc1 |
| Al Boldi | [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| drew | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Kevin Cummings | VESA video support during boot. |
| Raymond Nijssen | Re: What the 17" monitor reviews never tell you |
| Michael Haardt | GNU shell utils 1.7: date(1) dumps core (with easy solution:) |
git: | |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
