* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:yes - i zapped hw breakpoint support in -v10 already. yes, that's what i've been doing. When anything became questionable even just a little bit, it was the axe or i changed it to something really obvious and correct. by 2.6.26 kgdb-light will become so neutral to the rest of the kernel that we wont even notice that we've merged it ;-) yeah. I believe we need to achieve a "known zero impact, 100% trustable" state for KGDB to start with, and add stuff carefully to it. yes - if something locks up, it will be the NMI watchdog starting the debugger eventually - not the other way around. The NMI watchdog is already system policy which can be turned on/off and is well known and expresses the user's wishes with what should happen to the system. The debugger should really be a fundamentally very passive "console" type of thing, with as little direct policy as possible. That minimizes the chance that it accidentally messes up something and also makes it more likely that it will actually work reliably and dependably. Ingo --
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 010/196] Chinese: add translation of Codingstyle |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| david | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
