* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:see? There's the difference between us. The initial merge of KGDB does not want to include policies for nuances that pose an "acceptable slight risk". Had we done it, you could have (rightfully in that case, i have to say) complained about that "slight but real danger" of a debugger activating without waiting for all CPUs to respond. yes, i said this the first time you mentioned this issue that while it's all no big deal, it could perhaps be a sensible (but default-off) layered-on option for later. But the initial merge is for obvious stuff and it does not want to do such things. Ingo --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ben Greear | Re: MACVLANs really best solution? How about a bridge with multiple bridge virtual... |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 |
