On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:Yes and the session has no fixed time limit. Stopping with interrupts off. Nothing scheduled anymore. An easy definition for the condition is anything that requires touch_{nmi,softlockup}_watchdog [which kgdb definitely does, although in a quite convoluted way] While that is a slight risk that problem is already there anyways. Lots of agents in the system could do that. Do you plan to stop all DMA too for example if you're so worried about this? Or how about SMM code changing something? Anyways the slight risk of the other CPUs eventually recovering would seem a acceptable trade off versus not being able to use the debugger to debug the system with hanging CPUs. A possible compromise between my and your position on this would be also having an option for this, with default to off (although I would expect that would be a inconvenient default for many people) -Andi (who retires from this thread now, I already spent too much on this) --
| Mark Lord | Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc7 |
| Kentaro Takeda | [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions. |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: Linux v2.6.24-rc1 |
| Al Boldi | [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| drew | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Kevin Cummings | VESA video support during boot. |
| Raymond Nijssen | Re: What the 17" monitor reviews never tell you |
| Michael Haardt | GNU shell utils 1.7: date(1) dumps core (with easy solution:) |
git: | |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
