On Tue, 12 February 2008 13:47:51 +0000, Stephane Chazelas wrote:Fairly obvious fixes. Sounds sane enough. But I do have some reservations about the implementation. It would be best if you split the patch in two. One with the obvious stuff above and one for this. The core of remove_device_by_name() is shared with block2mtd_exit(), so a common helper would be good. Your error handling is better, so let's keep that version. And independently of your patch a mutex protecting the device list from simultaneous modifications would be good to have. Side note: I may not have internet access until 19th or so. Jörn -- Rules of Optimization: Rule 1: Don't do it. Rule 2 (for experts only): Don't do it yet. -- M.A. Jackson --
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Justin C. Sherrill | Mailing list archive |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 08/13] syslets: x86, add move_user_context() method |
git: | |
| Steven Rostedt | Re: -rt scheduling: wakeup bug? |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
