Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/uaccess_32.h:449

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adam Litke <agl@...>, David Gibson <david@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 - 1:16 am

On 11.02.2008 [23:17:40 -0500], Miles Lane wrote:

Does this not happen with the patch reverted? I'd be really surprised if
this had any effect on your fans... You could always just revert the
patch you bisected down to from 2.6.24-git20 (it just closes a race in
hugetlbfs code, which you're not going to hit with the commands below),
to see if it is a pre-existing condition in 2.6.25-rc0.


( Thanks for that message, btw )


Nor am I. You might be able to bisect it down by just putting

# CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is no set

in your .config and seeing where it was introduced, that will avoid the
sysctl that had the BUG altogether.

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from inval..., Nishanth Aravamudan, (Sun Feb 10, 5:25 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from inval..., Nishanth Aravamudan, (Mon Feb 11, 6:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from inval..., Nishanth Aravamudan, (Tue Feb 12, 1:16 am)
Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from inval..., Nishanth Aravamudan, (Sun Feb 10, 5:26 pm)