Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 10:07 pm

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:30:22 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:


This is identical to what I have now.


As it's now post -rc1 and not a 100% obvious thing, I tend to hang onto
such patches for a week or so before sending up to Linus

Should this be backported to 2.6.24.x?  If so, the reasons for such a
relatively stern step should be spelled out in the changelog for the
-stable maintiners to evaluate.

Thanks.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Feb 4, 12:03 pm)
Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all ..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Feb 5, 11:12 am)
Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all ..., Christoph Lameter, (Tue Feb 5, 12:04 pm)
[PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask ..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Fri Feb 8, 12:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict node ..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Feb 9, 10:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict node ..., Linus Torvalds, (Sun Feb 10, 12:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict node ..., Lee Schermerhorn, (Mon Feb 11, 9:47 am)
Re: [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] Mempolicy: silently ..., Andrew Morton, (Mon Feb 11, 10:07 pm)