Re: Scheduler(?) regression from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24 for short-lived threads

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 9:30 pm

On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 16:45 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:


Yes, I'm wondering the same.  With latest git, ~400 usec work units
suffice to achieve overlap (on my P4/HT), whereas all other kernels
tested require several milliseconds.

	-Mike

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Scheduler(?) regression from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24 for shor ..., Mike Galbraith, (Mon Feb 11, 9:30 pm)