On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:26:02PM +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
[...]
Hi Joerg,
There's a small problem with smack and NFS. A similar report was also
sent here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/85
Could you please check below patch ? I think it should fix your problem.
I've also added similar checks in inode_{get/set}security(). Cheating
from SELinux post_create_socket(), it does the same. Casey, Thoughts ?
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 1c11e42..eb04278 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int smack_inode_getsecurity(const struct inode *inode,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
sock = SOCKET_I(ip);
- if (sock == NULL)
+ if (sock == NULL || sock->sk == NULL)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
@@ -1280,10 +1280,12 @@ static void smack_to_secattr(char *smack, struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *nlsp)
*/
static int smack_netlabel(struct sock *sk)
{
- struct socket_smack *ssp = sk->sk_security;
+ struct socket_smack *ssp;
struct netlbl_lsm_secattr secattr;
int rc = 0;
+ BUG_ON(sk == NULL);
+ ssp = sk->sk_security;
netlbl_secattr_init(&secattr);
smack_to_secattr(ssp->smk_out, &secattr);
if (secattr.flags != NETLBL_SECATTR_NONE)
@@ -1331,7 +1333,7 @@ static int smack_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
sock = SOCKET_I(inode);
- if (sock == NULL)
+ if (sock == NULL || sock->sk == NULL)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
@@ -1362,7 +1364,7 @@ static int smack_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
static int smack_socket_post_create(struct socket *sock, int family,
int type, int protocol, int kern)
{
- if (family != PF_INET)
+ if (family != PF_INET || sock->sk == NULL)
return 0;
/*
* Set the outbound netlbl.
--