Re: udf regression: broken directory handling

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Marcin Slusarz
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 12:13 pm

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:

with patch applied:
joi tmp # dd if=/dev/zero of=./test.udf count=102400
102400+0 records in
102400+0 records out
52428800 bytes (52 MB) copied, 1.08618 s, 48.3 MB/s
joi tmp # mkudffs ./test.udf
start=0, blocks=16, type=RESERVED
start=16, blocks=3, type=VRS
start=19, blocks=237, type=USPACE
start=256, blocks=1, type=ANCHOR
start=257, blocks=16, type=PVDS
start=273, blocks=1, type=LVID
start=274, blocks=25069, type=PSPACE
start=25343, blocks=1, type=ANCHOR
start=25344, blocks=239, type=USPACE
start=25583, blocks=16, type=RVDS
start=25599, blocks=1, type=ANCHOR
joi tmp # mount -t udf -o loop ./test.udf ./udf/
joi tmp # cd udf/
joi udf # ls -l
total 0
joi udf # touch q w e r t y u i o p
joi udf # ls -l
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Feb 11 19:03 lost+found
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:03 q
joi udf # cd ../
joi tmp # umount udf/
joi tmp # #(reverting patch)
joi tmp # rmmod udf
joi tmp # rm test.udf
joi tmp # dd if=/dev/zero of=./test.udf count=102400
102400+0 records in
102400+0 records out
52428800 bytes (52 MB) copied, 1.0559 s, 49.7 MB/s
joi tmp # mkudffs ./test.udf
start=0, blocks=16, type=RESERVED
start=16, blocks=3, type=VRS
start=19, blocks=237, type=USPACE
start=256, blocks=1, type=ANCHOR
start=257, blocks=16, type=PVDS
start=273, blocks=1, type=LVID
start=274, blocks=25069, type=PSPACE
start=25343, blocks=1, type=ANCHOR
start=25344, blocks=239, type=USPACE
start=25583, blocks=16, type=RVDS
start=25599, blocks=1, type=ANCHOR
joi tmp # mount -t udf -o loop ./test.udf ./udf/
joi tmp # cd udf/
joi udf # touch q w e r t y u i o p
joi udf # ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 e
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 i
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Feb 11 19:05 lost+found
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 p
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 q
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 r
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 t
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 u
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 w
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 y
joi udf # cd ../
joi tmp # umount udf/
joi tmp # #(applying patch again)
joi tmp # rmmod udf
joi tmp # mount -t udf -o loop ./test.udf ./udf/
joi tmp # ls -l udf/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Feb 11 19:05 lost+found
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  0 Feb 11 20:06 q
joi tmp #
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
udf regression: broken directory handling, Marcin Slusarz, (Sun Feb 10, 3:48 am)
Re: udf regression: broken directory handling, Jan Kara, (Mon Feb 11, 4:09 am)
Re: udf regression: broken directory handling, Marcin Slusarz, (Mon Feb 11, 12:13 pm)
Re: udf regression: broken directory handling, Jan Kara, (Tue Feb 12, 4:39 am)
Re: udf regression: broken directory handling, Marcin Slusarz, (Tue Feb 12, 11:26 am)
Re: udf regression: broken directory handling, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Feb 13, 3:36 pm)
Re: udf regression: broken directory handling, Jan Kara, (Thu Feb 14, 2:49 am)